Furnaces

This diagram shows the relationship between the inflow of fuel and the thermal power developed during the combustion process, depending on the energy content (LHV) of the fuel itself. A draft of this diagram is the first deliverable we discuss with our clients, to carefully evaluate the present and future mix of materials to be used as fuel. This means that the actual need for the flexibility of the system is the first issue we face. Flexibility is the first requirement we investigate because it can have a strong impact on your business plan. A more flexible system will probably cost more but gives you the possibility to process low energy content fuels, generally available at lower costs. The final diagram is considered a contractual document and gives the foundation for the next steps in the design of the furnace.

This figure is defined as 1's complement to the heat absorbed by the combustion chamber walls. It resumes the furnace behavior in relation to changes to the fuel characteristics and the thermal flow developed in the furnace during the combustion process.
We can have two extremes, a totally adiabatic furnace (adiabatic degree equal to 1) and a totally non adiabatic furnace (adiabatic degree equal to 0).
Depending on the system's requirements, any intermediate solution can be designed.

The non-adiabatic furnaces are integrated with the boiler and realized with tube walls. Today this is the most common design, at least in waste incineration. These furnaces are cooled by the water naturally circulating in the walls tubes, therefore they are less sensitive to the problem of controlling the temperature in the combustion chamber.
Given the low fumes specific production, these furnaces have the best energetic performances.
Highly efficient, these furnaces are not as flexible to variations in combustible energy content.

The adiabatic furnaces are completely lined with refractory materials.

• This is the optimal design option when processing materials with low energy content, or high moisture.
• In the basic implementation of this furnace, the cooling of the combustion chamber is obtained by blowing air.
• This worsens energetic yield, increasing fumes generation
• Compared to non-adiabatic, tube walls furnace, the adiabatic, refractory lined one is less efficient but highly flexible to changes in the fuel energy content and the thermal flow to handle
• Our original design solves this problem by recirculating exhaust fumes instead of blowing air. This solution, while more expensive, allows attaining performances very close to those of a non-adiabatic system.

The modeling and simulation of the furnace-boiler allow a detailed investigation of the behavior of the system. Proprietary mathematical models have been developed, to optimize the design of the system, and identify critical issues that can compromise the efficiency of the system, increase the environmental impact of operations, or damage the equipment.

Amongst the elements analyzed:

• thermodynamic equilibrium of the combustion process
• geometry of the combustion chamber
• relation between the heat exchanged through furnace walls, and the values of the parameters defining the combustion process
• thermal exchange in the first sections of the boiler
• temperature of combustion air (primary and secondary)
• flame temperature
• the relation between residence time and gas temperature
• Oxygen content and presence of pollutants in the fumes
• Formation of macro and micro pollutants
• Amount of fumes to be recirculated in the system